The Economist has an interesting article on the NATO Summit. It begins:
THE NATO summit in Bucharest was meant to be a celebration of France's full return to the fold and a show of long-term commitment to stabilising Afghanistan. Instead it turned into a particularly rancorous dispute about matters closer to home: how far and how fast NATO should continue to expand, and how it should deal with a more aggressive Russia.
The article is the usual well informed fare from the Economist, with some interesting anecdotes from the Summit. Well worth the read.